UK companies a whopping £346 million every year , despite Britain being labelled ‘ the most resolute ’ country for dealing with the cyber attacksAttack.Ransom. In fact , more than 40 per cent of mid-large UK business suffered on average five ransomware attacksAttack.Ransomduring the last year , according to research by Vanson Bourne . However , 92 per cent of security professionals feel confident in their ability to combat ransomware in the future . And there was more good news for British . The survey found the UK to be the most resolute , both in refusing to pay ransom demandsAttack.Ransom, as well as the most effective in combatting them . They experience the fewest number of attacks : 40 per cent , versus 70 per cent in Germany , 59 per cent in France and 55 per cent in the USA and enjoy a 43 per cent success rate in successfully defending against attacks . The research , commissioned by SentinelOne , reveals that ransomware is costingAttack.Ransomindividual businesses around the globe an average of £591,238 per annum . The research all concluded that the number of companies ravaged by ransomware is on the rise . Results show that the overall percentage of companies experiencing ransomware has increased from 48 per cent in 2016 to 56 per cent in 2018 , however the average number per year has fallen from six to five attacks . The amount of time spent decrypting ransomware attacksAttack.Ransomhas also increased from 33 to 40 man-hours . The study also reveals that employees are considered the major culprits responsible for introducing the malware into the business . This was further supported by the fact that phishingAttack.Phishing, which seeks to socially engineer employees , was the top attack vector by which ransomware infiltrated the business in 69 per cent of instances . Migo Kedem , director of Product Management at SentinelOne said : “ It ’ s staggering to see the cost to British businesses of £346 million . This figure shows that businesses are becoming increasingly aware that it ’ s not just the ransom demandAttack.Ransom, but rather the ancillary costs of downtime , staff time , lost business , as well as the data recovery costs and reputational damage that are the biggest concern to British businesses. ” He added : “ On a more positive note , it ’ s good to see CISOs feeling more bullish about their ability to tackle ransomware using the latest behavioural AI-based end-point technology . It ’ s also encouraging to see a clear movement against companies caving in to ransomware demandsAttack.Ransom, preferring instead to take more proactive measure such as back-ups and patchingVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilityof vulnerable systems . However , the volume of ransomware attacksAttack.Ransomis still increasing and their speed , scale , sophistication and success in evading detection with the growth in file-less and memory-based malware , explains why ransomware will continue to be a major threat to CISOs in 2018 and beyond . ”
Researchers found they were able to infect robots with ransomware ; in the real world , such attacks could be highly damaging to businesses if robotic security is n't addressed . Ransomware has long been a headache for PC and smartphone users , but in the future , it could be robots that stop working unless a ransom is paidAttack.Ransom. Researchers at security company IOActive have shown how they managed to hack the humanoid NAO robot made by Softbank and infect one with custom-built ransomware . The researchers said the same attack would work on the Pepper robot too . After the infection , the robot is shown insulting its audience and demandingAttack.Ransomto be 'fed ' bitcoin cryptocurrency in order to restore systems back to normal . While a tiny robot making threats might initially seem amusing -- if a little creepy -- the proof-of-concept attack demonstrates the risks associated with a lack of security in robots and how organisations that employ robots could suddenly see parts of their business grind to a halt should they become a victim of ransomware . `` In order to get a business owner to pay a ransomAttack.Ransomto a hacker , you could make robots stop working . And , because the robots are directly tied to production and services , when they stop working they 'll cause a financial problem for the owner , losing money every second they 're not working , '' Cesar Cerrudo , CTO at IOActive Labs , told ZDNet . Taking what was learned in previous studies into the security vulnerabilities of robots , researchers were able to inject and run code in Pepper and NAO robots and take complete control of the systems , giving them the option to shut the robot down or modify its actions . The researchers said it was possible for an attacker with access to the Wi-Fi network the robot is running on to inject malicious code into the machine . `` The attack can come from a computer or other device that is connected to internet , so a computer gets hacked , and from there , the robot can be hacked since it 's in the same network as the hacked computer , '' said Cerrudo , who conducted the research alongside Lucas Apa , Senior Security Consultant at IOActive . Unlike computers , robots do n't yet store vast amounts of valuable information that the user might be willing to pay a ransomAttack.Ransomto retrieve . But , as companies often do n't have backups to restore systems from , if a robot becomes infected with ransomware , it 's almost impossible for the user to restore it to normal by themselves . If the alternative for a victim of robot ransomware is waiting for a technician to come to fix the robot -- or even losing access it to weeks if it needs to be returned to the manufacturer -- a business owner might view giving into the ransom demandAttack.Ransomas a lesser evil . `` If it 's one robot then it could take less time , but if there are dozens or more , every second they are n't working , the business is losing money . Keeping this in mind , shipping lots of robots takes a lot of time , so the financial impact is bigger when you have a computer compromised with ransomware , '' said Cerrudo . While the robot ransomware infections have been done for the purposes of research -- and presented at the 2018 Kaspersky Security Analyst Summit in Cancun , Mexico -- IOActive warn that if security in robotics is n't properly addressed now , there could be big risks in the near future . `` While we do n't see robots every day , they 're going mainstream soon , businesses worldwide are deploying robots for different services . If we do n't start making robots secure now , if more get out there which are easily hacked , there are very serious consequences , '' said Cerrudo . As with security vulnerabilities the Internet of Things and other products , the solution to this issue is for robotics manufacturers to think about cybersecurity at every step of the manufacturing process from day one . IOActive informed Softbank about the research in January but Cerrudo said : `` We do n't know if they [ Softbank ] are going to fixVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitythe issues and when , or even if they can fixVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitythe issues with the current design . '' Responding to the IOActive research , a Softbank spokesperson told ZDNet : `` We will continue to improve our security measures on Pepper , so we can counter any risks we may face . ''
DDoS extortionists have already pounced on the Memcached DDoS attack vector in attempts to extract paymentsAttack.Ransomfrom attacked companies . Akamai revealed earlier today that it detected DDoS attacks executed via Memcached servers that were different from others . Instead of blasting targets with UDP packets containing random data , one group of attackers is leaving short messages inside these packets . This one group is askingAttack.Ransomvictims to payAttack.Ransom50 Monero —around $ 17,000— to a Monero address . The group does n't say it will stop the attack but only implies it . Such attacks have first appeared in 2015 and were initially referred to as DDoS-for-Bitcoin after the DD4BTC group that pioneered such tactics . The group would send emails to various companies , threatening to launch DDoS attacks unless they paid a ransom feeAttack.Ransom. Even if the group 's members were arrested , other factions appeared in subsequent years , using unique names such as Armada Collective or XMR Squad , but also mimicking hacker groups such as Anonymous or LulzSec . The tactic , now known as ransom DDoS (RDoS)Attack.Ransom, has become quite popular among cybercriminal groups , and there have been too many RDoS campaignsAttack.Ransomto remember in the past years . In most past cases , attackers did n't have the firepower to launch DDoS attacks if victims ignored the ransom demandAttack.Ransom. But the Memcached-based DDoS extortionsAttack.Ransomare different . Attackers clearly have the DDoS cannon to take down companies , mainly due to the large number of unsecured Memcached servers they can abuse to launch these attacksAttack.Ransom. Victims are also more likely to payAttack.Ransom, seeing that they 're under a heavy attackAttack.Ransomand this is n't just an empty threat . But according to Daniel Smith , a Radware security researcher who spoke with Bleeping Computer , paying the Monero ransomAttack.Ransomwo n't help companies at all.That 's because attackers have used the same Monero address for multiple DDoS attacks against different targets . Here 's the same Monero address from the Akamai attacks , but spotted by a different security researcher . Attackers would n't have the ability to tell which of the multiple targets they attacked paid the ransomAttack.Ransom. The general consensus is that this group is using a carpet bombing technique , hittingAttack.Ransomas many targets as possible for short bursts , hoping to scare one into payingAttack.Ransom. `` Multiple targets are sent the same message in hopes that any of them will pay the ransomAttack.Ransom, '' Akamai said in a report today , echoing Smith 's recommendation not to pay the ransomAttack.Ransom. `` There is no sign to suggest that they are actively tracking the targets reaction to the attacks , no contact information , no detailed instructions on payment notification , '' Akamai added . `` If a victim were to deposit the requested amountAttack.Ransominto the wallet , we doubt the attackers would even know which victim the paymentAttack.Ransomoriginated from , let alone stop their attacks as a result . ''
Federal officials , Microsoft and Cisco are working with the city of Atlanta to resolve the attackAttack.Ransom, but Atlanta 's mayor wo n't say if the city paidAttack.Ransomthe $ 51,000 ransomAttack.Ransom. As of Saturday , Atlanta officials and federal partners were still “ working around the clock ” to resolve the ransomware attackAttack.Ransomon city computers that occurred around 5 a.m. on Thursday , March 22 , and encrypted some financial and person data . As @ Cityofatlanta officials & federal partners continue working around the clock to resolve issues related to the ransomware cyber attackAttack.Ransomlaunched against the City , solid waste & other DPW operations are not impacted . — ATLPublicWorks ( @ ATLPublicWorks ) March 24 , 2018 On Thursday , the official investigation included “ the FBI , U.S. Department of Homeland Security , Cisco cybersecurity officials and Microsoft to determine what information has been accessedAttack.Databreachand how to resolve the situation. ” A city employee sent WXIA a screenshot of the ransom demandAttack.Ransom, which included a pay-per-computer optionAttack.Ransomof $ 6,800 or an option to payAttack.Ransom$ 51,000 to unlock the entire system . CBS 46 reported that the ransom demandAttack.Ransomand instruction said : Send .8 bitcoins for each computer or 6 bitcoins for all of the computers . ( That 's the equivalent of around $ 51,000 . ) After the .8 bitcoin is sent , leave a comment on their website with the provided host name . They ’ ll then reply to the comment with a decryption software . When you run that , all of the encrypted files will be recovered . On Friday , March 23 , city employees were handed a printed notice as they walked through the front doors . They were told not to turn on their computers until the issue was resolved . Officials were still unsure who was behind the attack . Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms advised city employees and customers to monitor their personal information , although there was no evidence to show customer or employee data was compromisedAttack.Databreach. Mayor Bottoms clarified what services had not been impacted and were still available to residents and which ones had been impacted . Mayor Bottoms will not say if Atlanta intends to pay the ransom demandAttack.Ransom, saying , “ We will be looking for guidance from , specifically , our federal partners on how to best navigate the best course of action. ” During a press conference , Bottoms said , “ What we want to make sure of is that we aren ’ t putting a Band-Aid on a gaping wound. ” She then turned the press conference over to Richard Cox , the City of Atlanta 's chief operations officer ; the poor dude is brand new to serving as Atlanta ’ s COO . He confirmed the existence of the ransom demandAttack.Ransombut would not reveal the contents .
Federal officials , Microsoft and Cisco are working with the city of Atlanta to resolve the attackAttack.Ransom, but Atlanta 's mayor wo n't say if the city paidAttack.Ransomthe $ 51,000 ransomAttack.Ransom. As of Saturday , Atlanta officials and federal partners were still “ working around the clock ” to resolve the ransomware attackAttack.Ransomon city computers that occurred around 5 a.m. on Thursday , March 22 , and encrypted some financial and person data . As @ Cityofatlanta officials & federal partners continue working around the clock to resolve issues related to the ransomware cyber attackAttack.Ransomlaunched against the City , solid waste & other DPW operations are not impacted . — ATLPublicWorks ( @ ATLPublicWorks ) March 24 , 2018 On Thursday , the official investigation included “ the FBI , U.S. Department of Homeland Security , Cisco cybersecurity officials and Microsoft to determine what information has been accessedAttack.Databreachand how to resolve the situation. ” A city employee sent WXIA a screenshot of the ransom demandAttack.Ransom, which included a pay-per-computer optionAttack.Ransomof $ 6,800 or an option to payAttack.Ransom$ 51,000 to unlock the entire system . CBS 46 reported that the ransom demandAttack.Ransomand instruction said : Send .8 bitcoins for each computer or 6 bitcoins for all of the computers . ( That 's the equivalent of around $ 51,000 . ) After the .8 bitcoin is sent , leave a comment on their website with the provided host name . They ’ ll then reply to the comment with a decryption software . When you run that , all of the encrypted files will be recovered . On Friday , March 23 , city employees were handed a printed notice as they walked through the front doors . They were told not to turn on their computers until the issue was resolved . Officials were still unsure who was behind the attack . Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms advised city employees and customers to monitor their personal information , although there was no evidence to show customer or employee data was compromisedAttack.Databreach. Mayor Bottoms clarified what services had not been impacted and were still available to residents and which ones had been impacted . Mayor Bottoms will not say if Atlanta intends to pay the ransom demandAttack.Ransom, saying , “ We will be looking for guidance from , specifically , our federal partners on how to best navigate the best course of action. ” During a press conference , Bottoms said , “ What we want to make sure of is that we aren ’ t putting a Band-Aid on a gaping wound. ” She then turned the press conference over to Richard Cox , the City of Atlanta 's chief operations officer ; the poor dude is brand new to serving as Atlanta ’ s COO . He confirmed the existence of the ransom demandAttack.Ransombut would not reveal the contents .
Federal officials , Microsoft and Cisco are working with the city of Atlanta to resolve the attackAttack.Ransom, but Atlanta 's mayor wo n't say if the city paidAttack.Ransomthe $ 51,000 ransomAttack.Ransom. As of Saturday , Atlanta officials and federal partners were still “ working around the clock ” to resolve the ransomware attackAttack.Ransomon city computers that occurred around 5 a.m. on Thursday , March 22 , and encrypted some financial and person data . As @ Cityofatlanta officials & federal partners continue working around the clock to resolve issues related to the ransomware cyber attackAttack.Ransomlaunched against the City , solid waste & other DPW operations are not impacted . — ATLPublicWorks ( @ ATLPublicWorks ) March 24 , 2018 On Thursday , the official investigation included “ the FBI , U.S. Department of Homeland Security , Cisco cybersecurity officials and Microsoft to determine what information has been accessedAttack.Databreachand how to resolve the situation. ” A city employee sent WXIA a screenshot of the ransom demandAttack.Ransom, which included a pay-per-computer optionAttack.Ransomof $ 6,800 or an option to payAttack.Ransom$ 51,000 to unlock the entire system . CBS 46 reported that the ransom demandAttack.Ransomand instruction said : Send .8 bitcoins for each computer or 6 bitcoins for all of the computers . ( That 's the equivalent of around $ 51,000 . ) After the .8 bitcoin is sent , leave a comment on their website with the provided host name . They ’ ll then reply to the comment with a decryption software . When you run that , all of the encrypted files will be recovered . On Friday , March 23 , city employees were handed a printed notice as they walked through the front doors . They were told not to turn on their computers until the issue was resolved . Officials were still unsure who was behind the attack . Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms advised city employees and customers to monitor their personal information , although there was no evidence to show customer or employee data was compromisedAttack.Databreach. Mayor Bottoms clarified what services had not been impacted and were still available to residents and which ones had been impacted . Mayor Bottoms will not say if Atlanta intends to pay the ransom demandAttack.Ransom, saying , “ We will be looking for guidance from , specifically , our federal partners on how to best navigate the best course of action. ” During a press conference , Bottoms said , “ What we want to make sure of is that we aren ’ t putting a Band-Aid on a gaping wound. ” She then turned the press conference over to Richard Cox , the City of Atlanta 's chief operations officer ; the poor dude is brand new to serving as Atlanta ’ s COO . He confirmed the existence of the ransom demandAttack.Ransombut would not reveal the contents .
Nearly three weeks after many of its systems were knocked outAttack.Ransomby a complex ransomware virus , Alaska ’ s Matanuska-Susitna Borough has restored most of its phone system , part of its geospatial information system and the online portal on which residents can pay their looming property-tax bills . But the borough , home to about 106,000 people outside Anchorage , still has many services to restore , prompting its elected officials last week to approve a disaster declaration in the cyberattack ’ s wake . The declaration could make the borough eligible for assistance from the Federal Emergency Management Agency . Meanwhile , local government systems are slowly blinking back online . In its most recent updates , the borough says it ’ s restored departments ’ phone servers and that full email service is expected within a week . But other systems are still being rebuilt after the borough ’ s encounterAttack.Ransomwith the ransomware known as BitPaymer , which locked down systems ranging from main file servers to the card-swipe mechanisms that control doors in government buildings . BitPaymer is a complex cocktail of malware that enters a targeted system through a Trojan horse , then lies dormant until it ’ s noticed and authorized users attempt to remove it , at which point it locks up the system with a demand for a sum of moneyAttack.Ransompayable in bitcoin . “ All of the pieces of this are the absolute worst in the world , and they have all been combined together and put on us at one time , ” borough IT Director Eric Wyatt says in a recent YouTube video about the response to the cyberattack . In the case of Mat-Su , as the borough is known to residents , Wyatt has said the Trojan component likely arrived as early as May 3 , more than two months before an attempted anti-virus sweep triggered the ransom demandAttack.Ransom. According to evidence found during the initial investigation of the attack , Mat-Su was at least the 210th victim of the BitPaymer package since it was first unleashed in June 2017 . This week , it possibly found its latest victim in the Professional Golfers Association , employees of which found themselves locked out of their systems on the eve of the prestigious PGA Championship . According to the cybersecurity research website BleepingComputer , the attack on the PGA resembles the one that hit Mat-Su . There ’ s no apparent timeline for when all of Mat-Su ’ s systems will be back to normal , though Wyatt says in his video update that the borough is receiving assistance from at least 20 other organizations , including tech vendors and the FBI . But the restoration of property tax payments on Aug. 2 came just in time : homeowners are required to pay half their 2018 tax bills by Aug. 15 , and as a borough press release states , “ there is traditionally a very long line for making payments in person . ”
MONTREAL—On Sept 10 , municipal employees in a region between Montreal and Quebec City arrived at work to discover a threatening message on their computers notifyingAttack.Ransomthem they were locked out of all their files . In order to regain access to its data , the regional municipality of Mekinac was told to depositAttack.Ransomeight units of the digital currency Bitcoin into a bank account — roughly equivalent to $ 65,000 . Mekinac ’ s IT department eventually negotiatedAttack.Ransomthe cyber extortionists down and paidAttack.Ransom$ 30,000 in Bitcoin , but not before the region ’ s servers were disabled for about two weeks . The attack highlights the inability of many small municipalities to adequately protect their data , but also the lack of guidance on cybersecurity provided to them by the Quebec government , according to Prof. Jose Fernandez , a malware expert at Montreal ’ s Polytechnique engineering school . “ Quebec is an embarrassment , ” Fernandez said in an interview , adding that he has tried without success to contact government representatives to alert them to the problem . “ There hasn ’ t been any traction on this issue in the past 15 years , ” he said . “ I try to speak to ( the government ) but there is nobody . Who are you going to call ? Nobody. ” Bernard Thompson , reeve for the Mekinac regional municipality , said the ransom demandAttack.Ransompresented a real dilemma for his small organization . Mekinac groups together 10 municipalities with a population of roughly 13,000 people . “ It was hard , clearly , on the moral side of things that we had to pay a bunch of bandits , ” Thompson said . Mekinac ’ s attackers used malicious software — known as malware or ransomware — to demand moneyAttack.Ransomin return for keys to unlock the data . Fernandez said it is ironic that Quebec is home to a thriving cybersecurity industry and is an emerging hub for artificial-intelligence research , yet the provincial government is “ decades ” behind other provinces in defending against cyberattacks . Still , Quebec is not the only province experiencing attacks . Several municipal governments and businesses in Ontario were recently hit by ransomware attacksAttack.Ransom, prompting the Ontario Provincial Police to issue an advisory in September . In response to the growing problem , Communications Security Establishment — the Defence Department ’ s electronic intelligence agency — launched the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security last month . It is responsible for monitoring “ new forms of ransomware ” and advising the federal and provincial governments . Spokesman Evan Koronewski said the centre has no provincial or territorial equivalent . Fernandez , however , notes that some provinces are taking significant steps . British Columbia and New Brunswick have established offices dedicated to protecting government data . Meanwhile in Quebec , he said , small towns are left unprotected . “ I ’ m hoping the new government does something about it , ” he said . Patrick Harvey , spokesman for the Public Security Department , disputed the claim the provincial government is unprepared for cyberattacks . He said the Treasury Department has a director of information responsible for ensuring government data is protected . The Public Security Department has a unit dedicated to responding to cyberattacks within the administration and provincial police . But municipalities are not part of the unit ’ s mandate . “ Municipalities are autonomous entities that are responsible for ensuring the security of their digital infrastructure , ” Harvey said . Mekinac ’ s servers were compromised after an employee opened and clicked on a link in a fraudulent email sentAttack.Phishingby the hackers . Once opened , the malware was downloaded onto the computer , giving the hackers access to the entire network . The hackers then encrypted all the data and held it hostage until they receivedAttack.Ransomtheir bitcoins . Once a system ’ s data is encrypted , it ’ s virtually impossible to crack the code without a key — and there is nothing police can do about it . Most professional criminals use commercial grade encryption and to locate a key to decrypt data would take “ astronomical effort in terms of computing , ” Fernandez said . “ You either payAttack.Ransomor you don ’ t get the data. ” The identity and location of Mekinac ’ s hackers were never discovered . Thompson said police seized some of his computers for analysis and told his office not to negotiate or payAttack.Ransomthe criminals . But Thompson said his region couldn ’ t heed that advice , because it would have meant months of data re-entry , costing significantly more than $ 30,000 . So they paidAttack.Ransom, got their data back and learned a valuable lesson . “ In the end , in terms of the security of our system , ( the attack ) was actually positive , ” Thompson said . A local cybersecurity company — for $ 10,000 a year — helped the regional municipality build firewalls and encrypt its own data . “ We are practically no longer vulnerable , ” Thompson said . “ Everything is encrypted now . Every email is analyzed before we even receive it. ” He warns that small towns across the province are just as susceptible to attack as his region was . “ Every day , our system catches malicious emails trying to penetrate — but they are stopped , ” he said . “ But the attacks keep coming . ”
Bristol Airport authorities were recently forced to take their flight information system displays offline for two days to contain a ransomware attackAttack.Ransom. The authorities dismissed the ransom demandAttack.Ransomand decided to rebuild the affected systems . For two days , flight status information was displayed on whiteboards and there was an increase in announcements over the speakers . Similarly , in the last few months there have been several cyberattacks targeting hospitals , city administration and sporting events . The servers of the US-based PGA were reportedly hit by ransomwareAttack.Ransomattacks right before the PGA Championship in the first week of August . A new ransomware called Everlasting Blue Blackmail Virus , which targets Windows PCs using spam and phishing campaignsAttack.Phishing, flashes former US President Barrack Obama ’ s image with the ransom message . Once the ransomware gains entry into the system , its looks for all .exe ( executable ) files and encrypts them , preventing users from running apps until the ransom is paidAttack.Ransom. Hot on the heels of the cyberattackAttack.Ransomon the town of Valdez in Alaska , Canadian town Midland in Ontario was hit by a ransomware attackAttack.Ransomin the first week of September . Hackers broke into the city database involving fire , water , and waste management and blocked access , demanding ransomAttack.Ransom. A major concern for cybersecurity experts is the fileless attacks , which are hard to detect . These attacks do not install a malicious software to infiltrate a victim ’ s computer , which makes it difficult for anti-virus solutions to detect them . According to Ponemon Institute , 35 % of all cyberattacks in 2018 were fileless , while security solution provider Carbon Black claims that fileless attacks accounted for 50 % of all successful data breachesAttack.Databreachtargeting financial businesses . Fileless attacks target legitimate Windows tools such as PowerShell ( a scripting language which can provide hackers unrestricted access to Windows API ) and Windows Management Instrumentation ( used by admins ) . By latching on to these tools , hackers gain control over the PC and eventually the organization ’ s database . In another recent development , researchers at F-Secure have come across a new vulnerability affecting PCs . Dubbed as cold boot , the attack can be carried off using a special programme through a USB drive connected to a PC . Using the programme , the hacker can disable the memory overwriting by rebooting the system , without a proper shutdown . The attack can be used to break into company system which might have access to the company network .
The city of North Bend , Ore. , was hit with a ransomware attackAttack.Ransomwhich temporarily locked out city workers from their computers and databases . “ One weekend morning a few weeks back all of our servers and things locked up , and we received a ransomware note that asked forAttack.Ransom$ 50,000 in Bitcoin these people would provide us with the code to unlock our computer systems , ” North Bend City Administrator Terence O ’ Connor told The World . Fortunately the city ’ s IT systems were backed up and officials were able to avoid the high ransom demandedAttack.Ransomby the criminals responsible for the attackAttack.Ransom. City officials did , however , call in the FBI to investigate the attack and while they were unable to identify anyone directly involved in the attack , they were able to trace the ransom demandAttack.Ransomto Romania . O ’ Connor added that the attack appeared to be a more sophisticated ransomware where there are two keys needed to unlock your system with one planted in the system and the other is held by the culprit . The city was insured and ended up having to payAttack.Ransomaround $ 5,000 in out of pocket expenses as well as added a firewall security to prevent future attacks .
East Ohio Regional Hospital in Harper 's Ferry , Ohio , and Ohio Valley Medical Center in Wheeling , West Virginia , both got affected by ransomware on the last weekend of November . [ 1 ] Due to this incident , ambulance patients were transported to other hospitals nearby and emergency room admissions were limited to walk-up patients only . Due to attack , employees needed to switch to paper charting and various systems were taken offline immediately . This fairly quick response limited the ransomware damage and prevented the possible data breachAttack.Databreach. [ 2 ] According to Karin Janiszewski , director of marketing and public relations for EORH and OVMC , hospitals reacted as soon as possible and , at the moment of writing , they are already using the computer network . On the following Saturday , Karin Janiszewski stated : There has been no patient information breachAttack.Databreach. The hospitals are switching to paper charting to ensure patient data protection . We have redundant security , so the attack was able to get through the first layer but not the second layer . IT staff dealt with the outbreak to avoid a data breachAttack.DatabreachWhen it comes to malware attacks on large companies , the lossAttack.Databreachof personal customer data is the worst thing that can happen . It seems that this time the situation was handled quick enough to prevent having the sensitive data being compromisedAttack.Databreach. IT team took several computers offline , and , because of this , most of the clinical operations transferred to other units , and emergency patients were automatically taken to different locations . On Saturday , when the incidents occurred , hospital officials stated that the staff is ready to take everything on paper until the downtime is over . Also , since this is a ransomware-type malware attackAttack.Ransom, hackers demand a ransomAttack.Ransom. However , officials did not select the scenario involving making the paymentAttack.Ransom. No matter how big or how little the ransom demandAttack.Ransomis , officials should n't even consider making the paymentAttack.Ransombecause it may lead to system damage or permanent data loss . [ 3 ] In the United States , data breachesAttack.Databreachand malware attacks on huge organizations have become a common thing , especially in the healthcare industry . In 2016 Hollywood Presbyterian Hospital paid the demanded ransomAttack.Ransomin Bitcoin after having its data encrypted . [ 4 ] The infection was widespread and the attackAttack.Ransomcost around $ 17 000 . Another incident that resulted in ransom paymentAttack.Ransomwas spotted in Kansas Heart Hospital in 2016 also . Unfortunately , after the payment was madeAttack.Ransom, attackers disappeared ignoring the promise to decrypt locked files . They send yet another ransom demandAttack.Ransominstead and asked forAttack.Ransoma bigger amount of money . Previously this year , the Indiana-based hospital got infected with SamSam which is an infamous ransomware virus which has been relying on specific infection tactics which is highly personalized . After considering different scenarios , the hospital decided to payAttack.Ransom4 BTC ( equal to $ 45 000 at that time ) for ransomware developers to get private keys needed for files ' recovery . Ransomware developers gave what they promised .
Two Iranian men already indicted in New Jersey in connection with a broad cybercrime and extortion scheme targeting government agencies , cities and businesses now face new federal charges in Georgia related to a ransomware attackAttack.Ransomthat caused havoc for the city of Atlanta earlier this year . A federal grand jury in Atlanta returned an indictment Tuesday accusing Faramarz Shahi Savandi and Mohammad Mehdi Shah Mansouri of violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act , federal prosecutors said in a news release Wednesday . The New Jersey indictment against the pair was filed last month on broad conspiracy charges that included the Atlanta cyberattack . Byung “ BJay ” Pak , the U.S. attorney in Atlanta , said in a news release that the Atlanta indictment was sought in coordination with the earlier indictment and seeks to ensure that “ those responsible for the attacks face justice here as well. ” The Atlanta indictment accuses the two men of launching a ransomware attackAttack.Ransomagainst Atlanta that encrypted vital city computer systems . The attack significantly disrupted city operations and caused millions of dollars in losses , prosecutors said . The Department of Justice has said the two men remain fugitives and are believed to be in Iran , though they are not believed to be connected to the Iranian government . No attorney was listed for either man in online court records . In the Atlanta attackAttack.Ransom, a ransomware known as SamSam was used to infect about 3,789 computers belonging to the city , prosecutors said . The ransomware encrypted the files on the computers and showed a ransom note demanding paymentAttack.Ransomfor a decryption key . The note demandedAttack.Ransom0.8 bitcoin per affected computer or six bitcoin to decrypt all affected computers . Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms said in the days after the ransomware attackAttack.Ransomthat the ransom demandAttack.Ransomwas equivalent to $ 51,000 . The ransom note provided a bitcoin address to pay the ransomAttack.Ransomand a website accessible only on the dark web , where it said the city could retrieve the decryption key , prosecutors said . The decryption key became inaccessible shortly after the attack , and the city didn ’ t pay the ransomAttack.Ransom, prosecutors said . The New Jersey indictment filed Nov 27 accuses the two men of creating the SamSam ransomware and says it was used to encrypt the computers of more than 200 victims , including government agencies , cities and businesses . Among the other victims are the city of Newark , New Jersey , the Colorado Department of Transportation , the Port of San Diego and six health care companies across the U.S. , according to the Justice Department . The New Jersey charges include conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud and related activity in connection with computers . The overall scheme allowed the hackers to make about $ 6 million and caused the victims to lose more than $ 30 million , prosecutors said .
The Advocate sought the ransom demandAttack.Ransomamount with a public records request of the Licking County Commissioners . Licking County Prosecutor Bill Hayes provided The Advocate the information Monday . A computer virus discovered Jan 31 caused Licking County government to shut down about 1,000 computers and its phone systems to prevent the virus from spreading , protect data and preserve evidence . The FBI and Bureau of Criminal Investigation were notified . County officials chose not to pay the ransomAttack.Ransom, and recovered data from its backups . By Feb 16 , most of the county system was back in service . Licking County Commissioner Tim Bubb said the price per bitcoin was about $ 1,100 when the computers were hacked , making the demandAttack.Ransomabout $ 30,000 . As of 4 p.m. Monday , the value of one bitcoin was $ 1,235 . The computer hack cost the county more than $ 50,000 , Bubb said , which includes insurance and overtime , but he does not regret refusing to pay the demandAttack.Ransom. `` I 'm just kind of hard-nosed about that , '' Bubb said . `` I feel we were violated by people with criminal intent , and we do n't owe them anything . '' Bubb said people have asked him why the county did n't just pay the demandAttack.Ransom, but Bubb said it may not have been that simple . `` There was no guarantee that would have been the final price , or that they would have acted honorably . There 's a certain amount of unknown that would make you uneasy . '' Sylint , a cyber security firm assisting the county , was set to notify the state that the county 's computer system was virus-free , Bubb said . The state asked for the assurance before it hooked back up with the county .
Security researchers report a massive uptick in the number of MongoDB databases hijacked and held for ransomAttack.Ransom. That ’ s sharp increase from last week when 2,000 MongoDB had been hijacked by two or three criminals . A wave attacks was first spotted on Dec. 27 by Victor Gevers , an ethical hacker and founder of GDI Foundation . That ’ s when he said a hacker going by the handle “ Harak1r1 ” was compromising open MongoDB installations , deleting their contents , and leaving behind a ransom note demandingAttack.Ransom0.2 BTC ( about $ 220 ) . Victims would discover they were hit with the data theft only when they accessed the MongoDB and came across a top database field with the ransom demandAttack.Ransomthat read , “ Contact this email with your IP of your server to recover your database ” . Escalation of the attacks happened fast jumping from 200 14 days ago to 2,000 the following week . On Friday the numbers were at 10,000 , and by Monday Merrigan said there was a huge spike in attacks via his Twitter account reporting 27,000 servers compromised representing 93 terabytes of data gone . Since identifying “ Harak1r1 ” as the original attacker , they say more than a dozen additional hackers are now actively targeting MongoDB installations as well . Researchers said that in many cases , data stored in the MongoDB now is simply being destroyed and when victims pay the ransomAttack.Ransomthey do not receive their data back . Last week , Gevers told Threatpost attackers were battling among themselves . He said , when one hacker would leaveAttack.Ransoma ransom note , another hacker would target the same database , delete the original ransom note and leave their ownAttack.Ransom. This further complicates a victim ’ s ability to retrieve data even if a ransom is paidAttack.Ransom, he said .
The average amount of a ransomware demandAttack.Ransomhas increased from $ 294 in 2015 to $ 1,077 last year , according to a report released last week by Symantec . `` That 's a pretty dramatic increase , '' said Kevin Haley , director of security response at Symantec . `` The bad guys can get almost anything they ask for , '' Haley said . Some cybercriminals also adjust the size of the ransom demandAttack.Ransomto the type of victim , askingAttack.Ransomenterprises for significantly larger amounts of money than they do of consumers . The company also surveyed ransomware victims , and found that 34 percent of people paid the ransomAttack.Ransomglobally . But in the U.S. , the number was 64 percent . All this money coming in is bad news for cybersecurity professionals . `` We 're seeing a lot more people investing in this business , because it 's highly profitable and it 's really easy to get into , '' he said . `` The end result is more malware , and more ransomware . The problem will continue getting worse . '' The Internet of Things was also a major topic in the report . Symantec operates an IoT honeypot , and the number of attacks nearly doubled over the course of 2016 . The intensity of attacks really surprised him , Haley said . During peak activity , attacks would come in every two minutes . That means that vulnerable devices would get infected almost as soon as they are connected to the internet , he said . `` If you plug it in , and decide to take care of security later , you 're already too late . '' There 's no grace period . `` But if the device is not using a default password , is patched , and is up to date , it can fight off most of those attacks , '' he said . `` Unfortunately , we know that there are a lot of devices out there with default passwords , or simple passwords , or have n't been patched . '' The 77-page report also covered a wide variety of other security-related topics . One in 131 emails contained a malicious link or attachment , the highest rate in five years .
Lost evidence includes all body camera video , some in-car video , some in-house surveillance video , some photographs , and all Microsoft Office documents . Data from that period backed up on DVDs and CDs remained intact . While archived data has its importance , more worrying is that the department lost data from ongoing investigations . In an interview with WFAA , who broke the story , Stephen Barlag , Cockrell Hill 's police chief , said that none of the lost data was critical . The department also notified the Dallas County District Attorney 's office of the incident . The department says the infection was discovered on December 12 , last year , and the crooks asked forAttack.Ransoma $ 4,000 ransom feeAttack.Ransomto unlock the files . After consulting with the FBI 's cyber-crime unit , the department decided to wipe their data server and reinstall everything . Data could not be recovered from backups , as the backup procedure kicked in shortly after the ransomware took root , and backed up copies of the encrypted files . According to the department 's press release , the Cockrell Hill police IT staff said they were infected with the OSIRIS ransomware . It 's quite possible that the department 's server was infected with the Locky ransomware , which a few days prior had come out with a new version that appended the `` .osiris '' extension at the end of encrypted files . The press release says the infection took place after an officer opened a spam message from a cloned ( spoofed ) email address imitatingAttack.Phishinga department issued email address . The infection did not spread to other computers because the server was taken offline and disconnected from the local network as soon as staff discovered the ransom demandAttack.Ransom. The department also said there was no evidence of data exfiltrationAttack.Databreachto a remote server .